{"id":6490,"date":"2015-01-22T20:42:09","date_gmt":"2015-01-23T02:42:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/?p=6490"},"modified":"2015-01-23T13:28:02","modified_gmt":"2015-01-23T19:28:02","slug":"extra-material-whowhatwhy-barrett-brown-day-of-reckoning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/2015\/01\/22\/extra-material-whowhatwhy-barrett-brown-day-of-reckoning\/","title":{"rendered":"Extra material for WhoWhatWhy “Barrett Brown Sentenced to 5 Years, After Facing More Than a Century” article"},"content":{"rendered":"

(5 years and 3 months, to be precise.) Okay: Material the media outlet cut from my piece<\/a>, plus bits of context:<\/p>\n

Brown spoke with WhoWhatWhy<\/em> earlier this week from jail to emphasize the dishonesty with which the authorities have prosecuted him. He referred to his sealed detention hearing, saying the FBI’s agent Allyn Lynd testified under oath that laptop evidence proved the writer admitted to SWATing (placing false 911 calls to get locked-and-loaded police commandos out to a mark’s home). Brown said that not only did Lynd get away with that false allegation\u2014which was at least explicable in that it served as a chief reason the judge denied bail\u2014but the agent also got away with the weird claim that the defendant had lived in the Middle East.<\/p>\n

“These people, these prosecutors, these FBI agents have blatantly lied so much,\u201d Brown told us. “They aren’t rookies; these are people who have been around for a long time. So what that tells me\u2014what that should tell everyone\u2014is that they don’t lie for fun; they do it because it works. And the question is, Why does it work? And how bizarre is it that these things work? There doesn’t seem to be any negative feedback to prevent an FBI agent from lying on the stand.”<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

The prosecution throughout has twisted words to manufacture a case against his work and, in so doing, a case against what 21st-century journalism stands to become.<\/p>\n

Brown, some of whose first writing sales were to America Online during its days as an Internet service provider, has long championed the decentralized, archival Internet as a better means of knowledge-production than the hierarchical media ecosystem where authors and pundits can lie persistently without consequences<\/a> not unlike his prosecutors. After all, the use of hyperlinks\u2014the primary controversy in his case\u2014allows scrupulous authors and readers to cross-check data and call out errors in great detail.<\/p>\n

Once Brown heard of Anonymous and WikiLeaks in 2010, he quickly realized how his crusade could be amped up with access to top-notch secrets and new<\/a> ways<\/a> to collaborate digitally. Soon he was giving more and more interviews to the traditional media\u2014some<\/a> of which the Department of Justice trotted out in court last December<\/a>\u2014explaining his political ideas and findings<\/a> about the authorities’ information warfare projects<\/a> and techniques<\/a>. Meanwhile, in chat rooms and on social media, he was showing others how to mine state-held business registrations, trademark filings, and press releases so they, too, could turn Anonymous\u2019s hack-leaks into actionable news and analysis. His audience grew and grew.<\/p>\n

The government didn’t<\/a> like<\/a> that<\/a> at all. Prosecutors let their motive slip during a 2013 hearing, as first reported by WhoWhatWhy<\/em>. That was when the Department of Justice made a failed attempt<\/a> to prevent Brown, while his case was ongoing, from criticizing anyone in the government whatsoever. (They did succeed in gagging him and his lawyers<\/a>, for several months, from speaking out about his legal battles.)<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

Despite the Department of Justice’s hammering of him, Brown has remained steadfastly defiant. Reading his allocution<\/a>, he told his judge, predictably, “I hope to convince Your Honor that I sincerely regret some of the things that I have done” but added with trademark dry humor: “Like nearly all federal defendants.”<\/p>\n

<\/a>\"Creative<\/a><\/p>\n

Extra material for WhoWhatWhy “Barrett Brown Sentenced to 5 Years, After Facing More Than a Century” article<\/span><\/em> by Douglas Lucas<\/a> is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License<\/a>. It does not affect your fair use rights or my moral rights. You can view the full license (the legalese) here<\/a>; you can view a human-readable summary of it here<\/a>. To learn more about Creative Commons, read this article<\/a>. License based on a work at www.douglaslucas.com<\/a>. Seeking permissions beyond the scope of this license? Email me: dal@riseup.net<\/a>.<\/p>\n

(5 years and 3 months, to be precise.) Okay: Material the media outlet cut from my piece, plus bits of context: Brown spoke with WhoWhatWhy earlier this week from jail...<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(5 years and 3 months, to be precise.) Okay: Material the media outlet cut from my piece, plus bits of context: Brown spoke with WhoWhatWhy earlier this week from jail to emphasize the dishonesty with which the authorities have prosecuted him. He referred to his sealed detention hearing, saying the FBI’s agent Allyn Lynd testified […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,83,93,42,40,94,55,23],"tags":[125,158,96,122,97,95,133,110],"class_list":["post-6490","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-activism","category-agitprop","category-barrettbrown","category-dfw","category-digital-ideologies","category-extramaterial","category-texas","category-writing","tag-activism","tag-agitprop","tag-barrettbrown","tag-dfw","tag-digitalideologies","tag-extramaterial","tag-texas","tag-writing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6490","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6490"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6490\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6510,"href":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6490\/revisions\/6510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6490"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/douglaslucas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}